Nichols & Eberth - Your Internet Link to All Things Legal
Home About Us Contact Us Locations Legal Links Legal News Alerts Newsletter Articles
Auto Negligence
Bankruptcy
Business Law
Business Incorporation
Collections/Creditors Rights
Consumer Law
Contracts
Contract Dispute Litigation
Criminal Defense
Custody & Support
Developer/Builder Litigation
Discrimination
Divorce
Divorce Mediation
Drunk Driving
Elder Law
Employment Law
Environmental Matters
Estate Planning
Grandparent Visitation
Immigration
License Restoration
Medical Malpractice
Municipal Law
Paternity
Personal Injury
Prenuptial Agreements
Probate
Products Liability
Real Estate Commercial
Real Estate Residential
Sexual Harassment
Slip & Fall
Social Security
Social Security Disability Insurance
Supplemental Security Income
Traffic Violations
Wills, Trusts & Powers of Attorney
Worker's Compensation
 
 

Legal News Alert #113

DEADBEAT PARENT GOES TO JAIL - INABILITY TO PAY NOT A DEFENSE

A deadbeat parent who was prosecuted for failure to pay child support should not have been allowed to introduce evidence of his inability to pay, the Michigan Court of Appeals has ruled in an issue of first impression.

The prosecution argued that such evidence is inadmissible because felony nonsupport is a strict liability crime.

The Court of Appeals agreed, reversing the trial court's denial of the prosecution's motion to exclude evidence of the dad's financial problems.

Defendant Richard Carl Adams and his wife were divorced in July 1991. They were awarded joint legal custody of their three children, and the defendant was ordered to pay monthly child support.

However, on June 4, 2003, a warrant was issued for the defendant's arrest for failure to pay an arrearage totaling $36,265.44.

The defendant was subsequently charged with one count of felony nonsupport pursuant to a new Michigan law. He pleaded not guilty and trial was set for October 7, 2003.

"Here, the maximum potential punishment is imprisonment for four years or a $2,000 fine", Judge Gage noted in her ruling in People vs. Adams.

"Although four years' imprisonment may seem severe, especially given that imprisonment will eliminate any ability for the defendant to pay support while he is incarcerated, the statute does afford the defendant a chance to redeem himself before a sentence is imposed," Gage explained. "If an obligor who defied a support order by failing to seek modification and choosing instead to just not pay, then fails to satisfy the bond conditions, the imposition of up to a four-year sentence is not severe; instead, at that point, the defendant has repeatedly demonstrated to the court that we will not adhere to the court order, and imprisonment is justified."

 

NICHOLS & EBERTH, P.C.
22374 Garrison, Dearborn, MI 48124

Free Initial Consultation

Call Dearborn office at (313) 561-5700 or
Call Birmingham, Northville, Troy office at (248) 952-1700 or
Call us toll free at 888-571-5700 or
Send us an email at email@michiganattorney.com

 
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Locations | Legal Links | Legal News Alerts | Newsletter Articles
 
Copyright © 2008-1997 by Nichols & Eberth, P.C. All rights reserved.